Performance Optimization in Kubernetes
Kubernetes gives you incredible flexibility — but with flexibility comes complexity. Without the right configurations, even powerful workloads like Spark and Flink can underperform or waste resources.
This post covers practical strategies for optimizing performance in Kubernetes-native data pipelines, using patterns supported by platforms like IOMETE.
1. Define Resource Requests and Limits
Kubernetes scheduling depends on well-defined resource boundaries.
Best practices:
- Set requests for CPU/memory to guarantee baseline availability
- Set limits to prevent a Pod from over-consuming
- Avoid running without requests — it leads to eviction or starvation
IOMETE dynamically sets executor resources and includes autoscaling policies out of the box.
resources:
requests:
cpu: "1"
memory: "2Gi"
limits:
cpu: "2"
memory: "4Gi"
2. Use Node Affinity and Taints
For heavy workloads (e.g., large joins, shuffle-heavy Spark jobs), bind compute Pods to high-performance nodes.
affinity:
nodeAffinity:
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
nodeSelectorTerms:
- matchExpressions:
- key: node-type
operator: In
values:
- high-memory
IOMETE allows custom node pools for Spark and ML jobs — including GPU-backed nodes or NVMe-optimized instances.
3. Leverage Horizontal and Vertical Autoscaling
- HPA (Horizontal Pod Autoscaler) adds/removes Pods based on CPU or Prometheus metrics.
- VPA (Vertical Pod Autoscaler) adjusts Pod resource requests automatically over time.
IOMETE supports both — scaling Spark clusters based on workload demand and terminating idle resources to cut costs.
4. Tune Spark for Execution Efficiency
Fine-tune Spark’s runtime behavior for better parallelism and memory usage.
Key settings:
spark.executor.memoryOverhead
: Buffer for off-heap memoryspark.sql.shuffle.partitions
: Controls parallelism during wide transformationsspark.dynamicAllocation.enabled
: Automatically add/remove executors
IOMETE offers preconfigured Spark profiles optimized for batch, streaming, and ad-hoc SQL workloads.
5. Batch vs. Real-Time: Optimize by Pipeline Type
Batch Workloads
Typical tools: Spark (batch), dbt, Airflow
Recommendations:
- Use Kubernetes CronJobs or Airflow DAGs with KubernetesExecutor
- Run jobs on spot/preemptible nodes to reduce cost
- Use Iceberg or Delta Lake for table storage
Real-Time Workloads
Typical tools: Flink, Kafka consumers, Spark Structured Streaming
Recommendations:
- Use StatefulSets for checkpointing and reliability
- Persist state to HDFS, S3, or RocksDB
- Monitor latency and backpressure using Prometheus and Grafana
IOMETE supports both modes — using Iceberg as a bridge between batch and streaming layers.
Case Study: ETL Modernization with IOMETE + Kubernetes
Challenge: A global enterprise running on Hadoop needed faster, cheaper ETL with better governance.
Solution:
- Deployed IOMETE on Kubernetes (via Rancher)
- Used MinIO as an object storage backend
- Rebuilt pipelines using Spark + dbt on Iceberg tables
- Airflow + ArgoCD handled orchestration via GitOps
Results:
- Job times improved 10x
- Infrastructure costs dropped 40%
- CI/CD reduced deployment from days to minutes
Summary
Performance optimization in Kubernetes-native environments is a continuous process — but it pays dividends in speed, cost, and stability.
With platforms like IOMETE, many of these best practices are automated:
- Autoscaling Spark clusters
- Node affinity for compute jobs
- GitOps-managed configurations
- Real-time monitoring via Prometheus